Recommendation for individuals using a screenreader: please set your punctuation settings to "most."
Descriptive Statements:
- Demonstrate knowledge of the principles and procedures for designing and carrying out scientific investigations.
- Recognize methods and criteria for collecting, organizing, analyzing, and presenting scientific data.
- Recognize the evidential basis of scientific claims.
- Demonstrate knowledge of safety procedures and hazards associated with scientific investigations.
- Demonstrate knowledge of the materials, equipment, and technology used in the sciences.
- Apply basic mathematical procedures in analyzing and representing data and solving problems in the sciences.
Sample Item:
A researcher wants to experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of three different types of insulation. The researcher completely wraps three identical glass containers in 1-cm-thick pieces of each type of insulation. The researcher fills the containers with water at 100°C100 degrees Celsius and then quickly seals them. After 15 minutes, the containers are opened and the temperature of the water in each container is measured. The same experiment is then repeated two more times with the same apparatus. The results of the three separate trials are then averaged. Which of the following changes to the experimental design would make this a better experiment?
- carrying out an additional trial that uses ice cubes to measure how long it takes the ice cubes to fully melt in the three different types of insulated containers
- measuring the temperature of the water in the three containers at several different time intervals to create a heat-loss curve for each material
- setting up a control in each trial to measure the change in temperature in a matching glass container without any added insulation
- increasing the thickness of the insulation used in order to more clearly distinguish the insulating properties of each of the materials
Correct Response and Explanation (Show Correct ResponseHide Correct Response)
C. This question requires the examinee to demonstrate knowledge of the principles and procedures for designing and carrying out scientific investigations. To improve the experimental design the researcher should test the insulating capacity of a matching glass container that has no insulation as part of each trial. The use of a control establishes a baseline against which the various insulating materials can be compared when analyzing the results.
Descriptive Statements:
- Demonstrate knowledge of the historical development of major scientific ideas, including contributions by men and women of diverse backgrounds.
- Demonstrate knowledge of current major theories, models, and concepts in physical science, life science, and Earth and space science.
- Identify unifying themes, principles, and relationships that connect the different branches of the sciences.
- Demonstrate knowledge of the nature of science as a system of inquiry.
Sample Item:
Lynn Margulis is a U.S. biologist whose contribution to the understanding of the
evolution of the eukaryotic cell was groundbreaking. Although originally rejected
repeatedly by mainstream biologists, her theory on the evolution of the eukaryotic
cell is now widely accepted. Margulis's work has helped establish that chloroplasts
and mitochondria in eukaryotic cells originally developed as a result of:
- the incorporation of free-living prokaryotes into other prokaryotic cells.
- the merging of two varieties of eukaryotic cell into a single-celled organism.
- the incorporation of nonpathogenic viral DNA into a primitive eukaryotic cell.
- the mutation of RNA in ancient prokaryotes that led to more efficient energy use.
Correct Response and Explanation (Show Correct ResponseHide Correct Response)
A. This question requires the examinee to demonstrate knowledge of the historical development of major scientific ideas, including contributions by men and women of diverse backgrounds. Lynn Margulis's original paper on the evolution of the eukaryotic cell and her work on endosymbiotic theory established that certain cell organelles (e.g., mitochondria, chloroplast) originated as free-living bacteria that moved into other prokaryotic cells, eventually evolving into eukaryotic cells over millions of years. Her persistence in arguing in support of the theory of endosymbiosis, even though it was strongly criticized by the mainstream biological community, demonstrates the importance of tenacity in putting forward new scientific ideas.
Descriptive Statements:
- Analyze the interrelationships between science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and society.
- Demonstrate scientific literacy in evaluating scientific research and the coverage of science in the media.
- Analyze social, economic, and ethical issues associated with technological and scientific developments.
Sample Item:
In a number of well-publicized cases, some of the most important and reputable scientific journals have had to retract published research papers because the research proved to be fraudulent. Which of the following strategies would most improve the system used by these journals for identifying fraudulent research papers before they are published?
- verifying that the data and methodologies described in research papers are legitimate
- giving priority to scientists who have previously submitted legitimate research papers
- releasing data and findings presented in research papers directly to the general public
- having scientists from outside the field review research papers when they are submitted
Correct Response and Explanation (Show Correct ResponseHide Correct Response)
A. This question requires the examinee to analyze social, economic, and ethical issues associated with technological and scientific developments. Prior to publication in a professional scientific journal, research papers are typically reviewed by scientists with similar professional backgrounds and knowledge of the research subject. Although the system usually works well, the complexity of some research makes peer review of submitted papers a costly and time-consuming process. Since appropriate methodology and accurate data are underpinnings of legitimate scientific research, further scrutiny of these two areas provides the best method for reducing the publication of fraudulent research papers.